Repository navigation
Redesign catalog navigation and standardize all 82 use-case summaries - #26
Conversation
Usecase Verification ReportNo usecase files changed. |
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 0f532e52de
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| args = parser.parse_args() | ||
| try: | ||
| data = load_catalog() | ||
| outputs = {ROOT / "README.md": render_readme(data)} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Running the documented renderer replaces the entire README with render_readme(data), so unrelated edits to installation, evidence, licensing, acknowledgements, or introductory text are silently discarded whenever a contributor updates the catalog. This conflicts with the contributor guidance that only generated README rows should not be edited by hand; limit replacement to explicitly marked generated regions (and the count badge) so ordinary README maintenance survives a catalog render.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Readers currently have to scan long descriptions across 14 mixed categories to find a suitable Hermes workflow. This redesign preserves all 82 entries and gives them a consistent way to compare outcomes and prerequisites.
Validation: all 82 entries occur exactly once in the full listing; generated README links and page backlinks resolve; original page bodies and source URLs are preserved; generation is idempotent; git diff --check passes. Checked the CI selector against all 82 real edits plus substantive-body and new-URL changes.
Source verification still runs for every substantive page edit or URL change. Generated-summary-only changes are identified by comparing the complete original body and URL set, and are checked by the renderer instead. No source-check thresholds or URL-check behavior were changed.
A separate read-only preflight of 94 existing non-GitHub URLs found 72 responding, 2 blocked, and 20 failures, including local/template addresses and pre-existing 404s. Those sources were not changed or relabeled as passing. The legacy weather-market page's missing primary URL is explicitly noted. No integrations were executed during this redesign.